SnapStream Forums

Go Back   SnapStream Forums > General Discussion > Off-Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:33 PM
Nick Burns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
Posts: 1,405
Skulltrail PVR?

As we've been told by many a poster here, it really doesn't take that much horsepower to run a PVR. It really comes down to a good graphics card and the throughput of your harddrives.

Given that, can you imagine a PVR built on the new Intel Skulltrail board?

It can take 2 of Intel's fastest chip the QX9775. Based on the latest street prices - Each QX9775 will set you back $1500. The board is $650.

That's $3650 and you haven't even added in the cost of case, graphics and HDD. Unfortunately, it still uses DDR2 memory. You'll also need the proper case.


Of course this board is really geared towards gamers and people with money to burn.
__________________
Case: HD160XT|PSU: CMPSU-520HX 520W|MB: Fatal1ty F-I90HD|OS HD: Seagate 160GB EIDE (WinXPSP3)|HDD: WD 750GB (x4 RAID0+1)|Intel E6420|Cooler: CNPS7700-CU|Mem: 2GB TWIN2X1024-6400C4 PC2-6400|ODD: LH-20A1H-185|Tuners (7OTA): (1) WINTV-HVR-1600 / (3) HDHomeRuns [8-way CVT-2/8PIA II]|Remotes: Harmony 1 / 880
BTV:v4.6.1 - 08/20/2007
BTV:v4.7.1 - 01/19/2008
BTV:v4.8.1 - 03/21/2008
BTV:v4.8.2 - 07/10/2008
BTV:v4.9.2 - 06/14/2009

Last edited by Nick Burns; 02-19-2008 at 07:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 162
Re: Skulltrail PVR?

My Core2Duo can achive about 45FPS DIVX encoding (Standard Def). That sucker could probably pull 330+FPS. Ever feel the need to convert a 1 hour MPEG2 into a DIVX in 6 minutes?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 390
Send a message via AIM to Greg Caulder
Re: Skulltrail PVR?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmordean View Post
My Core2Duo can achive about 45FPS DIVX encoding (Standard Def). That sucker could probably pull 330+FPS. Ever feel the need to convert a 1 hour MPEG2 into a DIVX in 6 minutes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Burns View Post
As we've been told by many a poster here, it really doesn't take that much horsepower to run a PVR. It really comes down to a good graphics card and the throughput of your harddrives.

Given that, can you imagine a PVR built on the new Intel Skulltrail board?

It can take 2 of Intel's fastest chip the QX9775. Based on the latest street prices - Each QX9775 will set you back $1500. The board is $650.

That's $3650 and you haven't even added in the cost of case, graphics and HDD. Unfortunately, it still uses DDR2 memory. You'll also need the proper case.


Of course this board is really geared towards gamers and people with money to burn.
Where do you guys get your reviews at. Just because you read it off engadget doesn't mean it is the best thing out there.


For gaming you gain about 20% increase in FPS.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/...t_3/page9.html


For Divx video encoding you see about 2% increase in encoding rate. The only thing increased in the decoding rate.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/..._3/page23.html

This defiantly proves you have no understandings of computer hardware related to computer software whatsoever.


It is mainly best for huge floating point calculations, such as CAD based programs, or 3D-Rendering - Cinema 4D, 3D-Studio Max(huge textures with billions of polygons. Games are meant for speed on demand. And these applications are not developed for 8 simultaneous threads of processing to each core. Neither is the Divx encoder. Only 4 cores. Another factor is the 12MB of cache per CPU, most programs on the market aren't optimized to use it all efficiently. So it will jsut be a waist.


In reality these are primarily for SERVERS, not you little old home server that you run, but hardcore servers. That run SQL databases that fully utilize x64 tech, and possible virtual infrastructure environments.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6300 | 2GB DDR2 | 3x500GB SATA2 in RAID 5 array | 2x250GB SATA2 HDD (OS HDD's) | 1x PVR-250 | 1x PVR-USB2 | PVR-150 | HVR-1600 /w QAM | Geforce 6600 | PureVideo Decoder | BTV 4.8.1

BTV Link 1: Hiper Group HMC-1x53x Slimline Media Case | Celeron 2.66Ghz | 1GB DDR2 | FX5700LE | XP Pro | PureVideo Decoder
BTV Link 2: AMD 2.0Ghz | 768MB DDR | FX5500 | XP Pro | Firefly Remote

Door 2 Door Tech Solutions

As of 3/27/2008
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:36 PM
Nick Burns's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
Posts: 1,405
Re: Skulltrail PVR?

Granted, I linked to the stock Intel board, which Tom's Hardware reviews (and I have read). I would never go with stock as they rarely have anything for the pro-consumer.

Asus and Falcon Northwest have already built their own boards/system based on the Skulltrail, all geared towards the "Ultimate gamer" (and first bragging rights). The Falcon Northwest system will set you back $10,000+. And I certainly wouldn't put a system like this together for a simple PVR either, it certainly would be waste.

But for the enthusiasts, it's exciting to see this kind of hardware coming out. It can only get better from here.
__________________
Case: HD160XT|PSU: CMPSU-520HX 520W|MB: Fatal1ty F-I90HD|OS HD: Seagate 160GB EIDE (WinXPSP3)|HDD: WD 750GB (x4 RAID0+1)|Intel E6420|Cooler: CNPS7700-CU|Mem: 2GB TWIN2X1024-6400C4 PC2-6400|ODD: LH-20A1H-185|Tuners (7OTA): (1) WINTV-HVR-1600 / (3) HDHomeRuns [8-way CVT-2/8PIA II]|Remotes: Harmony 1 / 880
BTV:v4.6.1 - 08/20/2007
BTV:v4.7.1 - 01/19/2008
BTV:v4.8.1 - 03/21/2008
BTV:v4.8.2 - 07/10/2008
BTV:v4.9.2 - 06/14/2009
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 12:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 51
Re: Skulltrail PVR?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Burns View Post
And I certainly wouldn't put a system like this together for a simple PVR either, it certainly would be waste.
Clearly its better suited for a link machine
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 06:10 PM
Joe The Dude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 384
Re: Skulltrail PVR?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportz103 View Post
Clearly its better suited for a link machine
That gives me an idea...
Perhaps such a powerfull Link Machine could actually run a PlayStation 2 Emulator (that's optomized for such a set-up) at full-speed with AA and AF...


While it would be very convienent to have near instant access to a full library of Video Games from the dawn of the VG Era, all the way up to last Gen (and possibly PS3 or Xbox360? or am i over-estimating it?), on one's Link Machine, the initial cost is rather steep.
__________________
BTV 4.9.0 Server: MSI 945P Neo3-F. C2D E6400 (LGA775). 2GB DDRII 667 (2x1GB).
Onboard Audio & Gb LAN. 7600GS*. XP Pro SP2.
6 SATA & 3 IDE Hard Drives.
PVR-500 (3 Type C [Rev E492] Cards). 4 Analog Cable, 2 Cable Boxes.
HDHomerun (3 Boxes). 4 QAM, 2 OTA.

BTV Link (Three of them): Foxconn 6150K8MA-8EKRS. Athlon 64 4000+ (Socket 939). 1GB DDR400 (2x512).
Onboard Audio & Gb LAN. 7600GS*.

*Passive Heatsinks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
©2004-2009 Snapstream Media