SnapStream Forums

Go Back   SnapStream Forums > SnapStream Product Discussions > Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2005, 02:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 40
Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

I currently run a Raid 0 setup on my BTV box. I'm starting to wonder if it is worth it to use raid with BTV. I'm currently using HDs that are sort of old, so I was thinking of replacing them with much faster SATA HDs and either get a new Raid card to run the SATA Raid or just get 1 hd and get rid of the raid setup.

I mostly notice performance degrading when recordings start and when showsqueeze starts the WMV index cycle on a show. This usually causes BTV Link to shutter until it finally finishes.

so, does raid 0 really improve performance with BTV?
__________________
P4 3ghz
3gb RAM
Radeon 9100
HD-PVR 1600 PCI
WinPVR 150 PCI
Windows XP Pro SP3
BeyondTV 4.x
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 251
Re: Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

BTV doesn't work well with RAID I've heard. Get a very fast
large non-RAID drive for best performance.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 3 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Laptop
Turion 64 ML-44 2.4Ghz, 2GB RAM
200GB RAID0 SATA 7200 RPM 8MB,
Dual SLI NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS 256MB
1920x1200 Resolution LCD
Beyond TV 4.6.0
Dish 322 reciever(S-Video), Hauppauge WinTV PVR USB2 Encoder
USB-UIRT IR blaster
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:30 PM
gjunky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 274
Re: Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

I have a single 160Gb (see signature) drive that records all my shows and holds the OS. I can record two shows and watch a recorded one, all from the same drive without any problem. Keep in mind that with RAID-0, althouh the total throughput will be a little higher, you also doubled your MTBF (doubled the chance you loose your data).

-gjunky
__________________
HTPC: BeyondTV 4.x / BTV Link 4.x / BM 1.1 - Shuttle SB65G2 - 2.6Ghz HT - 2Gb Corsair
300 ATA100 Seagate - Hauppauge PVR-500 - FusionHD-USB - Gigabyte Radeon 9600Pro-256Mb
4x DVD +/-R/W - Gyration Ultra Suite - Kameleon + MCE Remotes
WinXP-MCE 2005
Mitsubishi 52", 1080P LCD HDTV

Media Server: AMD Sempron 2500 - 1Gb Corsair - 30Gb System drive
Promise ATA RAID-5 with 4 * 200Gb Seagate
Headless - 100Mb ethernet - Antec Sonata
Windows 2003 Standard Server



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 3 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2005, 09:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Re: Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

It would be best to separate your data drive from your boot drive. That said, for best performance you would want three drives, one for the OS, and a RAID 0 of two drives for the BTV data files. Stripe of 64k is fine as your video files are large. Also, to help with performance, create a separate partition for the paging/swap file. RAID 0 will increase your risk of a drive crash by the number of drives you use. Frankly, I only use two disks in RAID 0, with separate partitions for OS, page file, and video data, and I don't care if it crashes as it is only TV. I'll just rebuild it.

And yes, defrag your data drive at night to keep up disk performance.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10
Re: Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

I am running 4 200 GB SATA drives in a RAID 5 configuration, and the performance is great. To gte the bester performace, make sure you get a good RAID controller card.

Chris
__________________
BTV Server (BTV 3.51)
Asus P4P800SE MB | Windows 2003 Server | P4 3.0 | 1Gb PC3200 | 4 x PVR-250 | ATI9200SE 128Mb | Promise FastTrak S150 SX4-M SATA RAID 5 controller with 4 x 200Gb SATA drives | Antec Sonata Quiet Case

Clients (BTV Link 3.51 + Meedio Essentials)
2 x Asus P4R800VM MB | XP SP2 | P4 2.8 | 512 Mb PC3200 | FX5700LE 128Mb | 80Gb SATA | CoolerMaster ATC-620 Case | Phantom 350 fanless PSU
1 x Asus P4S533MX MB | XP SP2 | P4 1.8 | 256 Mb PC2700 | FX5700LE 128Mb | 60Gb ATA
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 40
Re: Raid 0 vs non-Raid setup

Do you think running an older hd using Ultra DMA 66 with a newer hard drive that uses Ultra DMA 100 would degrade performance? my 80gb raid setup uses an old 40gb maxtor HD and a newer 40gb IBM deskstar, and by newer i mean in the last 4 years.
__________________
P4 3ghz
3gb RAM
Radeon 9100
HD-PVR 1600 PCI
WinPVR 150 PCI
Windows XP Pro SP3
BeyondTV 4.x
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
System rebuild, to raid or not raid... Cavar Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum 8 06-07-2007 04:37 PM
RAID and FreeNAS queonda Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link 18 07-18-2006 09:48 AM
RAID or not mickwall Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link 8 06-10-2004 02:17 PM
raid Lachlan SnapStream Discussion 4 04-22-2004 08:12 AM
Sil 3112A RAID w/ PVR-250 maqo Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum 0 03-01-2004 05:50 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
©2004-2006 Snapstream Media