![]() |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
MCE has three problems, as far as I am concerned.
1) Without a hack, MCE only supports two analog tuners 2) All guides for all tuners have to match (even HD) 3) dvr-ms files. I'll take my MPG thank you The interface is very good, though, and I use MCE to playback many of my BTV files, particularly when I load them to my laptop. |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
Has anyone compared HD in MCE vs. BTV4? I'm running BTV4 now but some of the guys at work are running MCE. None of them are running if with HD tuners.
Can anyone give me a comparison between the two using only HD tuners? I would like my final system to have two HD tuners.
__________________
Widows XP Pro SP2 Biostar TForce4SLI Motherboard Athlon 64 3700+ 1GB Memory 250GB SATA Fusion HDTV 5 Gold Firefly remote eVGA Geforce 6800GS CO SE 256MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCIe Turtle Beach Montego Sound Card |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
Quote:
The big downside to MCE was it doesn't have a product like BTV Link (I didn't investigate any of the extender boxes as i already have a computer capable of playing hi-def in my bedroom). So I'd record on my pc in my living room, and I could map drives from my bedroom, but I was left with windows media player to play them. Not much of a 10' interface there. And you would have to wait for MCE to finish recording before you could watch it. So if you only want to record and watch HDTV on 1 pc and it has MCE on it it's a viable solution. But if you want/need BTV Link functionality, BTV blows MCE away. |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
The problem I have with BTV is the format it records HD in. It saves them as MPEG2 transport stream files and you can't change the format type it saves them in via BTV setup.
I'm in the process of installing one of the new D-Link DSM-520 media extenders and it won't process .ts files. The DSM-520 has the capability to recieve HD content that has been streamed to it in WMV9, MPEG2, MPEG4 (Advanced Simple Profile only) and AVI (MPEG4 layer only). The unit is small and noiseless and would allow me to build a nice beefy BTV box with a couple of HD tuners and then watch my recorded shows if I could save teh shows in one of the other HD formats. I could convert the saved files but that is an extra step of processing I'm trying to avoid.
__________________
Widows XP Pro SP2 Biostar TForce4SLI Motherboard Athlon 64 3700+ 1GB Memory 250GB SATA Fusion HDTV 5 Gold Firefly remote eVGA Geforce 6800GS CO SE 256MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCIe Turtle Beach Montego Sound Card |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
I guess I'm really waiting for a cheap Tvivo-like set-top box with upgradable harddrive that can handle HD, cable card 2.0, wireless for guide download, and simple to use (NO SLOW MO bug pls!). The PC solution is getting ridiculous... Why do I want my PC to handle TV? ~_~ This is what B. Gate wants us all to think PO is the solution for everything... Com'on, where were all the great CE???
But who would release such hardware?.... D-Link? MS? Sony? ATI? Last edited by fanbanlo; 04-01-2006 at 02:21 PM. |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
Quote:
The majority of us go to the PC solution because any set-top boxes like you mention would most likely be either A) an expensive lifetime fee for guide-data, or B) a monthly fee for guide-data. With the PC, it's free. BTV wouldn't be nearly as popular as it is if they charged for guide-data monthly in my opinion. Plus, companies like TiVo want you to buy a new box (hence Series 1, or Series 2, etc), it forces you to buy a new lifetime suscription with that box if you don't do the monthly thing. Allowing the end user to easily upgrade would slow-down the necessity to ever buy a newer box - a.k.a. - one with more capacity. *shrug* Just my opinion on the whole thing. Last edited by KyleK29; 04-03-2006 at 08:41 PM. |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
Quote:
But PC is just not meant to be used like HTPC.. no matter what case you chose, what remote you get, it is just not the same. ~_~ Just not userfriendly enough. It should act like a CE, plug in, and work! Why fuss with all the bugs of your TV app (like BTV?). This is totally stupid and i can see in a few yrs, we will laugh at ourselves trying to make a large pc doing these kind of things when all you need is a tiny set-top box (or built-into TV). |
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
I've had good support from snapstream and really like Beyond TV. from the time I've begun using BTV, it continues to improve. I have to agree with tscales on some of the problems with M$E. Also, I really prefer to give my business to a company who's main business is HTPC and not just an add on to an already bloated operating system.
|
|
|||
|
Re: MCE vs BTV4
Quote:
__________________
Server: 3.2 GHZ p4 hyperthreaded | XP Home SP2 | 1 GB RAM | Record Drive 200 GB SATA | O/S & ShowSqueeze Drive 200 GB SATA | nvidia 5300 | PVR-250 | DVICO USB HD | ATI HDTV Wonder Link 1: AMD 64 3500+ | XP Mediacenter | 1 GB RAM | 200 GB PATA | 80 GB PATA for Mediacenter recording | ATI X700 | 46" Samsung DLP DVI 1280x720 | 2 PVR-250's Link 2: AMD Athlon XP 3000+ | XP Home SP2 | 1 GB RAM | 160 GB HD | ATI Radeon 9600 | 42" Panasonic Plasma 1024x768 VGA |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BM and BTV4 vs. Win MCE | Lachlan | Home Theater PC Discussion | 4 | 10-02-2006 06:32 PM |
| BTV4.3 PVR 150 and 16:9 | ntloser | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 6 | 08-06-2006 12:30 PM |
| Best OS to Use for BTV4? | jdgonko | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 8 | 12-18-2005 10:51 AM |
| Contemplating BTV4 | drfish | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 7 | 12-06-2005 08:47 AM |