![]() |
|
|||
|
performance issue using network share
I have an issue when I include the share on my server where I store my mpeg library. With BTV 3.5 it is unuseable (very slow). With 3.7 it is much better but still too slow bring up the list in a reasonable amount of time. However using BM it works well so clearly there is something different about the way the two apps access the share. What gives? If I point to a small share it's fine (one sub and 10 files. However the server has many sub-directories and contains around 900 gigs of files.
While I realize that this is not a bug but it is something I think needs to be addressed. TIA...
__________________
PVR - Dell SC430 Server | 4GB RAM | PVR-350/150 tuners | 250GB storage Mass Storage 1 - MS Server 2003 Ent. Ed. x64 w/8GB ram, 5TB (Raid5) Mass Storage 2 - NASLite+ w/1TB |
|
|||
|
Re: performance issue using network share
mapping, is one better than the other for this?
__________________
PVR - Dell SC430 Server | 4GB RAM | PVR-350/150 tuners | 250GB storage Mass Storage 1 - MS Server 2003 Ent. Ed. x64 w/8GB ram, 5TB (Raid5) Mass Storage 2 - NASLite+ w/1TB |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ShowSqueeze to a network share? | richardkaufmann | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 13 | 11-12-2007 12:49 PM |
| Recording onto network share | UmHelp | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 5 | 10-06-2006 12:08 PM |
| can we share performance data? | nrf | Beyond TV and Beyond TV Link User-to-User Troubleshooting & Support Forum | 11 | 05-02-2005 02:27 PM |
| NeroNET - Share CD/DVD burner across the network | Xiadix | SnapStream Discussion | 1 | 08-13-2004 02:30 PM |
| HAVE NETWORK TO SHARE VIDEO FILE ? | AMEN | SnapStream Discussion | 1 | 06-04-2001 12:06 PM |